有没ds923的?求测试下smb下4k小文件速度。。
反正我是用群晖的老机器。之前想smb放一些游戏或者软件直接运行,,结果复制就半天了,以为ssd会和机械的4k复制差不多结果很啦。但最近有个帖子说4k小文件速度全看你服务器性能了。
求测试。 小文件肯定快不了,我1821小的就慢 元首的动物园 发表于 2023-8-15 22:11
小文件肯定快不了,我1821小的就慢
那肯定快不了。但是多快。ssd能达到普通机械性能那就很好了。 4K速度跟CPU性能相关的,同一个SSD才好点和差点的CPU平台上测4K速度都会有差距 谁测试下,,,, suicaoya123 发表于 2023-8-16 17:05
谁测试下,,,,
我920 怎么测? 1621放过几MB级别程序直接运行[困惑]大的没试过
我这个NAS接的内网就2.5G,反正我不放心运行程序[流汗] 923的性能也没啥好啊。 nickybaby 发表于 2023-8-16 18:13
我920 怎么测?
920的话估计和我的918差不多。我现在918.想顺便看看923万兆口速度。 jcd_chh 发表于 2023-8-16 18:22
1621放过几MB级别程序直接运行大的没试过
我这个NAS接的内网就2.5G,反正我不放心运行程序 ...
主要是4k小文件读写,打开文件也要半天的。 suicaoya123 发表于 2023-8-16 19:02
920的话估计和我的918差不多。我现在918.想顺便看看923万兆口速度。
CPU性能没啥提高的,都说了923+是反向升级!
918+ 是J3455,920+ 是J4126,923+是R1600
4K小文件的瓶颈不是CPU吧,这几个机型差别不会多大。瓶颈应该在硬盘/SSD的Q1T1,要极限可用傲腾做缓存盘。 DS1621+,CPU是V1500B,内存4+16G;
SATA SSD RAID1 阵列(西数蓝盘、镁光MX500);
SMB下的FIO(Win 11 12700KF ),I-225V 2.5G连接NAS的群晖官方单电口(10G)2.5G,中间是XDR6088接的两个2.5GE LAN,熟悉的软件都跑不起网络位置,所以命令照抄的阿里云的(https://help.aliyun.com/zh/nas/user-guide/test-the-performance-of-a-nas-file-system?spm=a2c4g.11186623.0.0.779f5cc0bFqbZt#concept-krf-y3s-qfb):
"c:\Program Files\fio\fio.exe" -name=Fio -numjobs=2 -iodepth=128 -direct=1 -ioengine=windowsaio -sync=1 -rw=randread -bs=4K -size=1G -time_based -runtime=60 -group_reporting -thread -directory=Z\:\
Fio: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=windowsaio, iodepth=128
...
fio-3.35
Starting 2 threads
Fio: Laying out IO file (1 file / 1024MiB)
Fio: Laying out IO file (1 file / 1024MiB)
Jobs: 2 (f=0):
Fio: (groupid=0, jobs=2): err= 0: pid=27412: Wed Aug 16 21:35:21 2023
read: IOPS=40.7k, BW=159MiB/s (167MB/s)(9549MiB/60005msec)
slat (usec): min=2, max=959, avg=12.64, stdev= 6.87
clat (usec): min=1700, max=36034, avg=6268.79, stdev=1036.10
lat (usec): min=1716, max=36039, avg=6281.43, stdev=1036.03
clat percentiles (usec):
|1.00th=[ 4817],5.00th=[ 5014], 10.00th=[ 5080], 20.00th=[ 5211],
| 30.00th=[ 5473], 40.00th=[ 6325], 50.00th=[ 6521], 60.00th=[ 6587],
| 70.00th=[ 6652], 80.00th=[ 6783], 90.00th=[ 6915], 95.00th=[ 7570],
| 99.00th=, 99.50th=, 99.90th=, 99.95th=,
| 99.99th=
bw (KiB/s): min=117008, max=203800, per=99.92%, avg=162832.66, stdev=10351.74, samples=238
iops : min=29252, max=50950, avg=40707.97, stdev=2587.93, samples=238
lat (msec) : 2=0.01%, 4=0.22%, 10=98.80%, 20=0.97%, 50=0.01%
cpu : usr=0.00%, sys=3.33%, ctx=0, majf=0, minf=0
IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, >=64=100.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete: 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.1%, >=64=0.1%
issued rwts: total=2444666,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=128
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: bw=159MiB/s (167MB/s), 159MiB/s-159MiB/s (167MB/s-167MB/s), io=9549MiB (10.0GB), run=60005-60005msec jcd_chh 发表于 2023-8-16 21:41
DS1621+,CPU是V1500B,内存4+16G;
SATA SSD RAID1 阵列(西数蓝盘、镁光MX500);
SMB下的FIO(Win 11 12 ...
iodepth太高了 实际场景里没有什么ioepth=128的 你要接近资源管理器真实性能你只能用iodepth=1 jcd_chh 发表于 2023-8-16 21:41
DS1621+,CPU是V1500B,内存4+16G;
SATA SSD RAID1 阵列(西数蓝盘、镁光MX500);
SMB下的FIO(Win 11 12 ...
太高端不太看得懂了- - 本帖最后由 jcd_chh 于 2023-8-16 22:44 编辑
gnattu 发表于 2023-8-16 22:15
iodepth太高了 实际场景里没有什么ioepth=128的 你要接近资源管理器真实性能你只能用iodepth=1 ...
抄的阿里云的
懒得看参数说明了
那补个depth=1的:
"c:\Program Files\fio\fio.exe" -name=Fio -numjobs=2 -iodepth=1 -direct=1 -ioengine=windowsaio -sync=1 -rw=randread -bs=4K -size=1G -time_based -runtime=60 -group_reporting -thread -directory=Z\:\
Fio: (g=0): rw=randread, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=windowsaio, iodepth=1
...
fio-3.35
Starting 2 threads
Jobs: 2 (f=2):
Fio: (groupid=0, jobs=2): err= 0: pid=23912: Wed Aug 16 22:42:15 2023
read: IOPS=7226, BW=28.2MiB/s (29.6MB/s)(1694MiB/60001msec)
slat (usec): min=5, max=1439, avg=14.15, stdev= 9.21
clat (nsec): min=323, max=214634k, avg=261857.33, stdev=504872.61
lat (usec): min=162, max=214651, avg=276.01, stdev=505.06
clat percentiles (usec):
|1.00th=,5.00th=, 10.00th=, 20.00th=,
| 30.00th=, 40.00th=, 50.00th=, 60.00th=,
| 70.00th=, 80.00th=, 90.00th=, 95.00th=,
| 99.00th=, 99.50th=, 99.90th=[ 1037], 99.95th=[ 1319],
| 99.99th=
bw (KiB/s): min= 7376, max=31322, per=100.00%, avg=28926.13, stdev=1767.22, samples=238
iops : min= 1844, max= 7830, avg=7231.04, stdev=441.80, samples=238
lat (nsec) : 500=0.01%, 750=0.01%
lat (usec) : 10=0.01%, 50=0.01%, 100=0.01%, 250=56.84%, 500=42.14%
lat (usec) : 750=0.35%, 1000=0.54%
lat (msec) : 2=0.10%, 4=0.01%, 10=0.01%, 20=0.01%, 50=0.01%
lat (msec) : 250=0.01%
cpu : usr=0.00%, sys=0.83%, ctx=0, majf=0, minf=0
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete: 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued rwts: total=433621,0,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
READ: bw=28.2MiB/s (29.6MB/s), 28.2MiB/s-28.2MiB/s (29.6MB/s-29.6MB/s), io=1694MiB (1776MB), run=60001-60001msec
NAS CPU占用看了眼也就7-12%
页:
[1]